It does not seem like the ease-of-use was a major concern in the development of the product. I do know that the interface is very archaic-looking. It is working, so I kind of leave it alone for right now because I do not really have the time to figure out what is making it work at all. So, the two main things that I look for in a router - speed and filtering by classification - are two things that I did not see.
I would like to do that and get it done in an expeditious manner and have it work as expected. There is nothing like that type of simplicity and functionality in this router. I would like to just be able to go in and say that I want to block out porn sites, or I want to block out hate speech - whatever the case may be. For instance, most later model routers have web filtering so we can filter out websites and types. MikroTik may make some routers and switches that do have higher throughput, but the models that we are using are not in that group of products. My first impressions of the MikroTik router I have are that it is old and slow. I would like to see a higher throughput in the switch. We're looking at some alternative brands, such as NETGEAR and MikroTik, to support our proposal." That's why they're looking for a solution that can provide performance and features without too much money or investment. They don't have the same budget that they had before when they installed Cisco products. Price-wise, Cisco is really expensive, and customers are expecting something different than Cisco so that they can save on IT costs. We're looking into upgrading in a cost-effective way to get the performance and yet still be at par with the quality and expectations that customers have from Cisco. It performs very well.įor one of our customers, the existing setup comprises Cisco Catalyst switches, and it is about 10 to 15 years old. "MikroTik is very cost-effective and quite good for the price.
"There are not any external or hidden costs.".
0 kommentar(er)
